Monday, August 14, 2006
'Bag / Not a 'Bag

Last week's discussion on that weasily little scrote with the uber-hottie was a good one, so I'm offering up this pic for similar analysis. I can't tell whether suntan boy and his pale, Heineken sipping sidekick rank as 'bags or not. I'm leaning towards creepybag stage 1 'bag status with potentials for both collars to pop in the near future (kind of like letting you know when a turkey's done).
Thoughts?
Comments:
<< Home
these dudes aren't all that douchey. the fact that they're just smiling for the camera and making no douchebag movements indicates they're pretty normal dudes. If follows their chicka is very cute, but not necessarily hot.
how much do you bet the two guys are secretly holding each other hands behind the hotties back? It's a secret love triangle of two gay males and one hottie ... coming soon to Jerry Springer
JERRY!! JERRY!! JERRY!!
JERRY!! JERRY!! JERRY!!
The one on the right has potential, the shirt is definitely going in bag direction and the hair could sprout into cactus quality at any moment...but I would have to vote on not a bag...although he would probably screw you out of your 401k if he could.
Lefty just looks bored. Very un-baggish.
Lefty just looks bored. Very un-baggish.
Two dorks & a babe. Give them time, there will be bling O' plenty and those gay-ass breast cancer wrist bands.
Bagbalm
Bagbalm
Those dudes may or may not be 'bags, but she is definitely no a hot chick. Sorry, but this picture should be removed.
She's a "cute" chick but not a "hot" chick. But I think the guy on the left has bigger bag potential. His slightly beefy forearms and slicked hair lead me to believe that he spends much time working out with his fellow fraternity brothers training to fulfill his destiny of full on bagdom by the time he's out of college.
By the way, I'll give odds that they either are currently attending or have attended USC and are legacies.
Not a douche. There is no Jesus bling or any hand gestures. The one on the left looks like a serial killer though.
left: I can't tell if that's an i'm-too-cool-to-smile sneer (which pre-qualifies him for Bag-status)
or
an i'm-going-to-chop-this-chick-into-little-bite-sized-morsels-and-spread-them-over-my-frat-brother's-finely-tanned-ass-before-giving-him-the-rim-job-he-deserves-for-that-awesome-keg-stand-he-did-last-night glare that make's him a psycho. but a bag-psycho nonetheless.
or
an i'm-going-to-chop-this-chick-into-little-bite-sized-morsels-and-spread-them-over-my-frat-brother's-finely-tanned-ass-before-giving-him-the-rim-job-he-deserves-for-that-awesome-keg-stand-he-did-last-night glare that make's him a psycho. but a bag-psycho nonetheless.
The one on the right is not yet a bag. He's just kind of average happy-go-lucky-dude. I also don't think the one on the left is technically one either, although his "Blue Steel" stare is a bit unnecessary. I just cannot tell if it is unintentional or if he aspires to being a douche. And, in the end, those who are douche do what it takes to get it done and leave no doubts. So, I say, not yet there, but on the path.
Art of the Douche
Art of the Douche
Left not a bag, right just barely a bag...extreme tan, pale fading colour shirt to show off the tan.
Left, not a bag. Right is definetly on the way there. My main concern though is that I am thinking the "chick" is actually a dude. The jaw line is far too square and there is severe lack of any frontal chest growth.
One creep, one half bag and one tranny.
One creep, one half bag and one tranny.
the bag in black shirt looks kinda sad. depending on what he's being sad about, he may not be a bag after all. but even then i'd still call him a "bag" just because.
Post a Comment
<< Home







