Was that really the photog, or whale squirts himself? At least this hots cleavite and sultry stare help to ease the pain.
 

He's overpaid.
 

Pay him, Im sure there are enough readers who can come up with a lifetime of payments for that jackass
 

Oh well. At least gabechuod is also a worthy HCwDB of the week as well.
 

She's hot now, but chicks like this hit the wall and hit it hard. I will measure her time in... hours.

Three hours from now she'll look like Tammy Faye Baker.

Oh, and I don't mean when she was alive.

Douche, Douche, Douche, Douche of Earl, Earl, Earl, Earl....
 

His manicured brows make me cringe. Nice to see him bringing his love doll out in public, though. Hopefully people are accepting of it...and that they keep sharp objects and open flame away from her. She's fragile...and flammable.
 

I just realized she has a douchier pout than he does. He kinda looks like Carmine Gotty.
 

(for the 50 bucks a night I get paid)

Paid for what, being the pivot man in a bath-house circle-jerk?
 

the bottle of Goose is still unopen... it's a prop! she has a full side of grease goin on & nice hair color (natural, right?). she is quickly morphing into a bleeth version of the borg
 

Hey creature, I didn't know you were working on the weekend 'bag-hunting crew.
 

@ ed

lurked as an anon for a couple of months (you may have recognized some of my limerick streams)... football & baggin' on douche-scrote is an all american combo
 

I've got it! These two are training to be stickybombs! I knew I should have checked my GI manual.
 

Fuck. No more Globe of Perfection. If the photobag wasn't so douchey he would just supply you with edited pix with his logo/name on the bottom so he gets the credit and might get a positive out of this. Whatta twat.
 

creature, I'm sure if I went back and read some, I could pick your style out. Limerick styles are like fingerprints and sexual deviations, no two are quite the same.

Speaking of sexual deviants, what Macy's display window did JP rob to get his date. I've banged blow-up dolls which looked more real.
 

He is a professional photographer and only gets paid $50 a night? How does he pay for his grey goose and date rape drugs?
 

@ ed

yeah just ask Mr. White, on both counts (he'll never live down water play).

we can just call JP, Lars, cuz the ass he gets more than toilet seat, is made outta' the same plastic.
 

$50 a night to take random pictures of other people having fun...and then tries to make them buy the picture. I guess he shares his take with the chick who walks from bar to bar selling wilted, overpriced roses, trying to make guys feel guilty for NOT buying them for their dates. What a loser!
 

@ creature,

No, he won't. We'll get a lot of mileage off him with that.
 

Geez, DB1. You got lucky here. It could have been much worse. Imagine if you'd posted one of his prize photos of Brittney or Lindsey inserting a suppository to clear up a particularly bad case of vaginal itch.

He might have tried to shake you down for $75 and a bus pass.
 

db1 how do you validate when someone is authentic when they claim to have rights over a photo? this guy seems like a fake.
 

Pack + snow storm = winna! sorry pfah.. now gonna roll my wager on the N.E. Cads (Tom Brady & Co.)

it would be interesting to see a before & after pic of this broad to calculate the effect of the JP Experience . a worthy Socialogical thesis study.
 

those eyebrows are fabulous; great shape. i wonder which spa he goes to...?

I wish I could see her arm in full, then that way I could know for sure if indeed his arms are smaller than hers (which is the present assumption)
 

those eyebrows are fabulous; great shape. i wonder which spa he goes to...?

I wish I could see her arm in full, then that way I could know for sure if indeed his arms are smaller than hers (which is the present assumption)
 

Maybe it was fate.

The breastal perfection of the Squirts' hott cannot be debated, but Gabehcuod was far douchier in a pure douche to douche comparison.

Karmic balance has been restored within the scrotal community.
 

the way i see it, we're better off because now we have technically had two winners this week.

They cant all take the crown, but its a start.
 

@ed, creature

Maybe I'll change my name to Mr. Yellow. Also, look for my new internet-only movie release, "Two Girls, One Mr. White."
 

wonder who wrote that comment? real anonymous russ!
 

Now that the football games are over...

Good lord. She looks like a freaking alien. JP was smart enough to steal her anal probe and show it to the photographer to ensure that there was some sort of evidence.

But, alas. The anal probe commenced and JP found himself squealing like a set of Goodyears on a souped-up Mustang being driven by a 17-year old with penis size issues.

I think JP is trying to tell us something... Something like, "they live! They're here with us!" Or, "Acapulo... beeyotch!". I just can't tell which.
 

Waitasecond--
He put it up on the internet...
Therefore, it's public domain.

Sorry, photodouche. If you want to get PAID for your pictures, don't slap 'em in a public forum like the internet.
 

Man, I wish I had found this site sooner...

Kudos on uncovering the douchebauchery and bacchanal ways of these clueless assaults on the senses.
 

shit was SO cash.
 

Someone needs to tell these chicks how stupid they look when they go to a low-rent plastic surgeon and have such obvious, ridiculous fake boobs bolted onto their chests.
 

She looks like a Star Trek extra from the planet Erotica. He looks like the dumbass that knocked up the DAs' 14 year old daughter...when he was 21.
 

Anyone mirror the pic that was taken down?
 

The photog is an even bigger "douche" for wanting to get paid for that picture.

Go blow it out your tampon, dork-stick!

It takes all types!
 

Just checking to make sure my intellectual property was removed from this site and now I get this.

I am a PROFESSIONAL photographer, folks. Those of you posting to this site that have jobs (minding the fries, I'm sure) get paid for your work also. Same thing. And its not "50 bucks a night".

As to the comment of leaving my image up with my logo watermarked on the bottom to drive business to my site: sorry, I'm more selective about my clients than that. But if I ever do need business from amateur hecklers I know where to come first.

And the couple of comments about "its on the internet so its public domain now": ask Napster how that worked out for them. Good luck in law school, Einstein.

And not that its any of my business but you people need a hobby or something. Sad.

Oh well, time is money and you'll get no more of mine. Buh-bye.

- "Photobag" (my apparent nom de plume I've been assigned by Management here).
 

in my judgment, gabehcuod shoulda won it handily anyway. this is like where the judges in jeopardy make a scoring adjustment.
 

Let's get this straight - photobag referred to a snapshot of the whale squirts as "intellectual" property?

I don't think there was a whole lot of intellect on display in that shot!
 

Hey, Photobag:

How's the lawsuit against Myspace going? I bet they didn't pay $50 per shot. Why? Because Felt Lounge paid you for the gig, right? That makes the prints theirs. If they post them in a public forum, then it's public domain. You're making assertions in all sorts of muddy waters. You can still seek compensation, but if this website chose to fight you, well, enjoy the expense for a reduced-rate settlement. If anything at all.

How DID it go for Napster? Simple. Anything already in a public format (radio in their case, myspace in yours) is fair game, my friend. I too am in the A&E profession, so I know whether my residuals are gonna come in or not. You need to go after your client, not this website. If the materiel is copyrighted to you only, then Felt Lounge needs to take it down. If they have the right to make it public without disclaimer, then the public has the right to copy it with little to no penalty. Sounds to me like being "selective" about your clients needs to extend beyond who'll let you in with no cover. Or rather, your clients need to be more selective about just how professional their "PROFESSIONAL" photogs are going to act.
 

Good advice; I think I will start a hobby - I'm thinking of photography. A lot of people confuse that hobby with being a serious career.

"The Felt Lounge"? Is 'Felt' a noun or a verb?
 

Clementine=1

Photobag=0

$50 a night!?! You must really, really suck to be paid so little.
 

Dear Lord.

The "50 bucks a night", which was in parentheses, was added by your site manager DB1, as were the other editorial flourishes he added in parentheses:

"My name is (photobag)..."

"...in (some crappy city)."

Try to stay with me, people. It's called "reading comprehension". Thanks for playing, but you lose.
 

RANDY? Is that you?

Photobag - thanks for the lecture on what we should be doing with our lives. Do you give this same lecture to the taints you take pictures of? Of course, it's funny you are spending time here arguing with us if we're so stupid.

I'm sure law school would go better for many of us than photography school did for you. Jeez, you left greasy cock-n-ballsacks on those guys' heads!
 

Photobag is as real as a Japanese sex-doll. I've seen more successful trolls reading 'Billy Goat's Gruff'.

Nice try. Thanks for playing. You lose.
 

@squatch:

He was quite literate, though. You have to give him that. None of the usual poor grammar and spelling skills that our anonymous trolls tend to have.
 

I thought he wasn't wasting anymore time with us? I can't believe this idiot "photobag" takes himself so seriously. What a worthless, obvious fraud.
 

@Rookie,

Yeah, I'll have to agree with you here. At least he was comprehensible without needing a six-pack and a big draw off of a bong.

I wonder where Flyteethth is. You'd figure he'd be raring to go, seeing as how J.P. is moving in on his alien haor.

Tarmal, J.P. Totally tarmal.
 

http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/5/15/1081235/douchebag.png

this picture was created by a picture posted on one of the doucheys myspace pages last year and subsequently made into a tshirt as a joke. sir douche contacted the shirt manufacturer to have this shirt removed due to "copyright infringement." A little more info into one of your stars of this infamous picture.
 

Photobag:

I'm having trouble understanding something. Just what the hell is your problem? You took a photograph of three hot chicks and 2.5 douchebags and it got posted here. So what? Sure, it's a good photograph, but is it art? Is it a work that you sacrificed hours or days of your life to create? Did you lose love, friends, or money to make it happen? No, you didn't. You got paid.

Let's be clear, Photobag. I've lived the life of an artist, and if someone stole my stuff and made money on it I'd hunt them down and cut their fingers off. But I digress. Look at this site. Is it riddled with ads? No. I'll bet that if we divide the small amount of ad revenue DB1 has received by the total number of photos on hcwdb.com the result would be a dollar amount that's barely enough for a happy meal. If I was a photog and my work got posted here affording DB1 an extra large bowl of Lucky Charms I would be proud. It would be a badge of honor.

Don't feel sorry for the 'bags. They deserve to be mocked and insulted, and this is where it happens. It must be done in an effort to save humanity from total decay. So why not join us? You would be exalted for your skills and access.

Until you decide to recant, however, you must be punished. Since you're being such a pussy about one photo of a bunch of clubbers, I went ahead and posted it here, here, and here. Right-click for best results.

Have a good evening.
 

The issue of copyright, "public domain," etc., comes up every few months here. For the record, photobag is more or less right and clementine is way off, from a legal perspective. First, and most importantly, a copyrighted work does not become "public domain," nor is any right of the copyright owner waived by simply posting the work to the internet. Second, whether or not Felt Lounge owns the rights to the picture is a matter of the contract between photobag and Felt Lounge; I'll skip that analysis because, in any event, the picture would still be subject to some third party's assertion of rights. third, lone scrote mcquade is correct that one measure of damages for copyright infringement is the profit of the infringing party, but he fails to mention that, in certain circumstances, the copyright owner may also be entitled to so-called statutory damages, which (if memory serves) can be up to $150,000 per infringed work (irrespective of any measure of profits). finally, no one has mentioned it yet, but take my word for it--any potential "fair use" defense to infringement would not apply here. i know this information contradicts the common wisdom on this topic, but this site is a giant copyright infringement machine. the good news is that it's unlikely to occur to any of these people to do anything about it.

--anon lawyer
 

simmer down jacob
 

anon lawyer @7:21 is pretty much on the money. I had to deal with these issues all the time during one phase of my publishing career. Posting something on the internet does not make it public domain, nor does it terminate the copyright holder's claim to it. You can link to it, but you can't just take it. (I'm looking at you, ebaumsworld.com.) Otherwise, there'd be nothing stopping me from copying articles and photos from nytimes.com, for example, and posting them on my own site for my own personal/financial benefit. In fact, one of the publications I worked for once declined to publish a photo that an author had "discovered." Somebody abandoned a roll of film on the street, and the author developed it and wanted to put it in an article about rights of the homeless. Our counsel advised that, even though the property had been physically abandoned, the photographer hadn't given up his/her copyright. Yeah, it's 99.999% likely that we could have published it with no repercussions--much like the photos on this fine site--but we didn't go forward with it. Although in that case, we felt it was kind of b.s. to run an article on the vulnerability of the homeless by publishing photos of/taken by the homeless without their consent, so it was as much a moral issue as it was legal.

Which isn't to say photobag isn't a 'bag, mind you...
 

The good news is that it's unlikely to occur to any of these people to do anything about it.

That's for sure. It also doesn't hardly occur to most of them to put on a shirt when out in public. And the chicks probably think Alan Dershowitz was the director of the latest movie with a John Grisham screenplay. If they even know who John Grisham is...

Cripes, Koko the Gorilla has more advanced language skills than most of the people depicted on this site, and a better SAT score to boot, I'll wager.

So. What's your opinion on anonymous Internet slander? :-)
 

@squatch

And this why we can hope to at least contain, if not defeat, douchebaggery. They're far, far, far too stupid to mount a proper defense. How can one mount sophisticated legal strategies when one is running wit da Goose? Luckily for us, the existence of this site is the answer to that question.
 

Well, some of you are very smart. So smart, in fact, that I can't even comprehend what you are saying.

But, I will say thank you Lone Scrote McQuade. I thought I would never see that side boob, and more importantly that loveley quasi brunette fawn again.

Oh, and thank you also, Natty Light.
 

@Mr. White,

Aye. Something tells me high-powered legal teams and guys wearing eyeliner don't mix.
 

Oops, my bad. Responding to te Napster statement where the findings were that once it entered a ppublic domain: "I recorded it off the radio" it was fair game for file share. Thanks for the learnin' anon attorney!

@photobag 3:19:

I guess We owe you compensation: You may suck Darksock's dick. BTW, What happened to:

"Oh well, time is money and you'll get no more of mine. Buh-bye."

???????????????????????????????????
 

are the photo snapperheads the only ones with rights here? interms of copyright? and don't they have to actually copyright the material and show proof of it in order to assert that right? my understanding is that one douche walking around has little or no right not be photographed or published...is this correct?
 

The douche spends more time in the mirror, and it is paying off, he is looks better that the 'ho.
Both are pitiful wastes of jizm.
 

photobag, damn you for taking away the heavenly cleavite. You bastard.

At least I have a Tina Louise section in my MMF, filed under the dewey decimal system, sec 999.9.
 

Well I ain't takin' no shit off nobody that says "nom de plume". I had to to do wikipedia to look that shit up. I thought it was a desert.

@ Squatch:

John Grisham is a fine Mississippian.
 

what the fuck JP your babe looks like her face is going to explode or something.wonder what she looks like in the morning without her make-up could be really scary ,me thinks
 

@michael douchekakis

No action is required to copyright a work. If I write a short story or record a song, I own the copyright as soon as it's created, as long as I haven't signed it away as part of a work-for-hire agreement, for example. You may have to prove you're the creator in a copyright case, though. If I want to claim someone ripped off my song, I'll need some good evidence that I created it first.

As far as right to privacy issues of the douchebags in question, that's getting a little out of my expertise. I don't know what claim, if any, a douche could make upon seeing his greasy visage on a website. Other than, "Jesus, I look like a douche." But that's not a legal argument, per se. Not yet.
 

@ michael Douchekakis

there's the "Poor Man's Copyright:" Simply mail yourself all drafts, start to finish and leave the envelopes unopened upon recipt. It's not Official, but there's a gov. date on all your work throughout progress. Though this will not hold up against Speilberg's attorneys...
 

Hey, let's just go nuts with this thread and open the topic of corporate tax law! Woo Hooooo!
 

is this hot chicks with douche bags or dinner at the goldberg's?
 

myspace.com/ellenhagans for all your side teet cravings.
 

oh my God is that JP,me and my girls still want him to come to a party at my place so we can use him,use him as our toilet that is.his smug mug should be covered in our pee and poop.then maybe we could use that g/f to clean us off.lol
 

@ anon 11:56 -

Don't get Mr. White all cranked up, now...
 

@darksock

Too late, as my new avatar indicates.
 

@ Mr. White:

Nice picture; did you take it with an Olympiss camera?
 

I really want to drop some kung foo douche lee on this fag while giving that girl a brrrruuuuuuuumsky at the same time
 

I'd like his address so I can send him my medical bills for the blinding bling and the subsequent vomit that was expelled onto my floor after seeing his douchiness. His boyfriends need to stop jizzing in his hair, its gonna get stuck that way. Maybe thats what he uses to wax his eyebrows too.
 

DB1 I think photobag had the felt lounge delete that pic from their myspace page. Well done. If we can't have it, nobody can.
 

Actually, the pic is still available, along with a bunch more from the same party.

Google "felt lounge louisville" and click the result that says MySpace.Com - Felt Lounge Louisville - 25 - Male . . ."

A truly fine collection of douchebags, hotts, and a hair-of-the-dog sideboob or two!
 

please...if you truly wanna view the douche's vicious pubertic transition go to listlouisville.com
 

No more Russ and Chriz. :(

I thought you guys were gonna win for the whole year! I voted like you asked me to!!!! and so did my girlies!

I'm sure we can take some more pics this weekend, only this time, I wanna be in it!

Russ, I have awesome boobs, lololol... luv u ;)
 

akmost forgot...

See you boys at List on the 25th!!!


its gonna be sikkkkkkkkkkk
 

Nice brows, DUDE! haha DOUCHE ON
 

I think the dude looks a little like Paris Hilton. Amirite?
 

uhh...you should have just left it posted...you were making an editorial comment on a photo that was widely circulated (it was on public view on the internet, hence it was widely circulated). If you are uncertain if that protects you enough, next time significantly alter the photo--such as change the color of shirts/clothing, etc. Not to mention, you are not profiting from the use of the photo, and it is likely he can't show that he has been harmed or damaged in any way...so, douche really doesn't have a lawsuit worth fighting!!!
 

Shit was so cash!
 

His death was SO crash